This is a class-action lawsuit alleging that Toyota Industries Corporation and its affiliates engaged in emissions testing fraud for their forklift and construction engines. A federal judge has signaled preliminary approval of a $436 million settlement ($299,500,000 in cash and an estimated $136,500,000 million in service credits and other relief) to resolve the class-action claims. This settlement would affect tens of thousands of business buyers who purchased Toyota's industrial engines. The core allegations center on emissions testing fraud involving Toyota Industries Corporation and its affiliated entities. According to the complaint, Toyota tampered with emissions testing procedures for their forklift and construction engines by replacing parts and modifying engine-control-unit software during certification tests. This manipulation allegedly caused the engines to perform differently in official certification tests compared to their real-world operation. The plaintiffs further allege that Toyota subsequently marketed these engines as "the cleanest" in the industry and "good for the environment," thereby misleading thousands of business buyers who purchased these products based on false environmental claims.

This litigation concerns allegations that Discover Financial Services, DFS Services LLC, and Discover Bank (collectively "Discover") misclassified certain consumer credit cards as commercial credit cards starting in 2007, resulting in merchants and others paying excessive interchange fees. A $1.2 billion settlement has been reached. This settlement impacts businesses, merchants and others who are alleged to have incurred excessive interchange fees.

This litigation concerns allegations that Toyota designed and sold vehicles with a defective ZF-TRW airbag control unit (ACU). The lawsuit further alleges that certain vehicles which contain this type of ACU are vulnerable to a condition that can cause the vehicles’ airbags and other passenger safety systems to malfunction during a collision, which may result in airbag non-deployment or other safety failures. Toyota denies all claims and the Court has not decided who is right or wrong.

Plaintiffs allege that Defendants conspired to block buy-side investors from trading Interest Rate Swaps on anonymous electronic platforms, limiting transparency and competition. They also claim Defendants restricted trading between buy-side investors to ensure dealer banks remained involved in every trade. These actions allegedly violated the Sherman Act and allowed Defendants to earn inflated profits. Although Defendants deny wrongdoing and claim they would win at trial, they agreed to settle to avoid ongoing litigation. Credit Suisse will pay $25 million, and other Settling Defendants will pay $46 million. If approved, the settlement funds—minus court-approved fees and expenses—will be distributed to eligible class members who submit valid claims.

Plaintiffs allege that direct purchasers of broadcast television spot advertising were subject to price fixing facilitated by an anticompetitive information exchange between and among certain major television station owners and operators and sales representative firms. As a result, they paid artificially inflated prices for television advertising, in violation of various federal and state laws and are seeking damages for these alleged harms.

This case revolves around allegations that Blue Cross Blue Shield Association and Settling Individual Blue Plans engaged in anticompetitive practices that violated antitrust laws

If you or your company accepted any Visa-Branded Cards and/or MasterCard Branded Cards in the United States at any time from January 1, 2004 to January 25, 2019, you may be entitled to a substantial payment.